This post is locked.
DirePresent·5/16/2020in JoJo Manga
<p>They're all equal, the reason Diavolo and the others went towards Polnareff's arrow so desperately was due to it being the nearest arrow around: the one who'd get it would get Requiem. The main issue is the ambiguity of Requiems and all that.You can even notice in the dialogues how they always talk about "the arrow": never mention it at "that arrow" or "requiem arrow". Diavolo even says "the arrow does more than just draw out Stand abilities?" refering to all arrows, never saying "he has a special arrow" or something like that.</p><p>To give an example I'd go as far as saying Bites The Dust is some sort of evolved stand in the same vein, there are several claims against that:</p><ul><li>Bites The Dust didn't make KQ sentient or it didn't change form, that's irrelevant since not every stand evolves in the same way (Chariot Requiem didn't ever say a word unlike GER, not even durignt that time Polnareff unlocked him while alive; some stands get Acts when they evolve, others like Star Platinum: The World stay the same),</li></ul><ul><li>The arrow stabbed Kira, not the stand... yet the stand was in the exact same place than Kira (it was probably targetting Killer Queen instead of Kira)</li></ul><ul><li>It's not named Requiem... yet Kira had no idea about such type of naming (something Polnareff came up with)</li></ul><p>And most importantly, in all cases it was a really powerful evolution that answered the main desperate need of its user (Polnareff wanting to get some advantage against Diavolo - putting his stand against himself is a good way to do so - and eventually consolidated his desire: to protect the arrow; Kira wanting to be able to keep himself unnoticed; Giorno wanting to defeat Diavolo). One may say why didn't the arrow tried to stab GE or KC like with Kira... I'd say with so many stand users around the arrow wasn't driven to do so (also Kira was way more desperated than any other Requiem user).</p><p>Giorno not having a Requiem after being hurt by Black Sabbath doesn't mean a thing, Diavolo's KC was later harmed by the "Requiem arrow" and he got nothing. Requiem is not Super Saiyan, or a shikai/bankai; it's not an ability every stand user can develop and it's not inherently related to the original abilites of the stand. It's extremely circ*mstancial, as some sort of rework of the stand to allow it to defeat the unsurmonable odds it has to face. I'd say that happened for a series of reasons:</p><ul><li> Giorno never considerated he was 100% unable to best Black Sabbath unlike Diavolo, he thought he could defeat him by using GE's abilities in a clever way. On the other hand he considered he had zero chance to best Diavolo with base Golden Experience.</li></ul><ul><li>Same with Diavolo, what could the arrow offer to someone who consider he had the best stand in the world? If it weren't by Diavolo having to share a body with Trish and the presence of SCR he could just wreck all of them in a pair of minutes and be done for. He was never desperate enough to consider he could lose until Giorno unlocked his Requiem</li></ul><p>I had even read people saying the difference is that the "Requiem arrow" allows both the user and its family to get a stand (like DIO and Pucci did, when Koichi's family got nothing). Yet that doesn't mean every single person can get a stand or would get a self-killing stand like Holy or Masazo Kinoto. The old man Black Sabbath stabbed with the arrow died instantly. Also there are too few instances of people with families being stabbed with the arrow (DIO, Pucci, Koichi.. as far as I recall that's all) and several of them are sort of unknown (we don't know how the Nijimura family got their stands)</p>
(Edited by DirePresent)
Bow and Arrow
Calebeto·9/2/2020
<div class="quote"><i>Daedalus100 wrote:<div class="quote">EDIT:You know what, you were just playing with that / this, I think I'm going to enter that little group of yours then;</i></div><br>this made me angry</div><p>Why? I already explained to the guy that both terms "That" and "The" can talk about just 1 object, but he keeps saying that Polnareff is "generalizing" in his lines.<br>I'll tell you, there are situations in which jojofa*g's are more boring than goku / naruto fans, and this is one of them, I wouldn't mind if it was called boring, but at least I don't use an argument as "generalizing", being that the person may also be talking about just 1 object.<br>Man there are countless arguments that I didn’t use here, like for example in thatscene giorno saying:<br>"I will not destroy this arrow";</p><figure class="article-thumb tleft show-info-icon" style="width: 180px"><a href="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/b/b6/I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png/revision/latest?cb=20200902014721" class="image image-thumbnail"><img src="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/b/b6/I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/180?cb=20200902014721" alt="I will not destroy this arrow" class="thumbimage " data-image-key="I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png" data-image-name="I will not destroy this arrow.png" width="180" height="191"></a> <figcaption><a href="/wiki/File:I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png" class="sprite info-icon"></a> </figcaption></figure><p><br><br>On this page, Giorno explains to Polnareff that he will not destroy this arrow, so this means that if he did not have this "duty of the survivors", he would destroy the arrow.<br>Now, why was he going to destroy the arrow? think:)</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>OBS: I admit that, there was a mistake in saying that "the arrow of the pucci ended up in Egypt", I really went to check and, at least in the flashback, there is no dialogue saying that it was ended up in Egypt (and that does not mean that it is not the same, and ended up in Egypt, it may be, it may not be).</p>
(Edited by Calebeto)
<div class="quote"><i>Calebeto wrote:<div class="quote">Daedalus100 wrote:<div class="quote">EDIT:You know what, you were just playing with that / this, I think I'm going to enter that little group of yours then;</i></div><br>this made me angry</div>Why? I already explained to the guy that both terms "That" and "The" can talk about just 1 object, but he keeps saying that Polnareff is "generalizing" in his lines.<br>I'll tell you, there are situations in which jojofa*g's are more boring than goku / naruto fans, and this is one of them, I wouldn't mind if it was called boring, but at least I don't use an argument as "generalizing", being that the person may also be talking about just 1 object.<br>Man there are countless arguments that I didn’t use here, like for example in thatscene giorno saying:<br>"I will not destroy this arrow";<figure class="article-thumb tleft show-info-icon" style="width: 180px"><a href="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/b/b6/I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png/revision/latest?cb=20200902014721" class="image image-thumbnail"><img src="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/b/b6/I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/180?cb=20200902014721" alt="I will not destroy this arrow" class="thumbimage " data-image-key="I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png" data-image-name="I will not destroy this arrow.png" width="180" height="191"></a> <figcaption><a href="/wiki/File:I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png" class="sprite info-icon"></a> </figcaption></figure><p><br><br>On this page, Giorno explains to Polnareff that he will not destroy this arrow, so this means that if he did not have this "duty of the survivors", he would destroy the arrow.<br>Now, why was he going to destroy the arrow? think:)</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>OBS: I admit that, there was a mistake in saying that "the arrow of the pucci ended up in Egypt", I really went to check and, at least in the flashback, there is no dialogue saying that it was ended up in Egypt (and that does not mean that it is not the same, and ended up in Egypt, it may be, it may not be).</p></div><p>this doesn't really prove anything, that arrow was closest to him, and it gave him a requiem stand, so he wouldn't destroy it so he could keep it and give it to whoever he deemed worthy of it</p>
(Edited by DewdOfStuff)
Calebeto·9/2/2020
<div class="quote"><i>DewdOfStuff wrote:<div class="quote">Calebeto wrote:<div class="quote">Daedalus100 wrote:<div class="quote">EDIT:You know what, you were just playing with that / this, I think I'm going to enter that little group of yours then;</i></div><br>this made me angry</div>Why? I already explained to the guy that both terms "That" and "The" can talk about just 1 object, but he keeps saying that Polnareff is "generalizing" in his lines.<br>I'll tell you, there are situations in which jojofa*g's are more boring than goku / naruto fans, and this is one of them, I wouldn't mind if it was called boring, but at least I don't use an argument as "generalizing", being that the person may also be talking about just 1 object.<br>Man there are countless arguments that I didn’t use here, like for example in thatscene giorno saying:<br>"I will not destroy this arrow";<figure class="article-thumb tleft show-info-icon" style="width: 180px"><a href="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/b/b6/I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png/revision/latest?cb=20200902014721" class="image image-thumbnail"><img src="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/b/b6/I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/180?cb=20200902014721" alt="I will not destroy this arrow" class="thumbimage " data-image-key="I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png" data-image-name="I will not destroy this arrow.png" width="180" height="191"></a> <figcaption><a href="/wiki/File:I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png" class="sprite info-icon"></a> </figcaption></figure><p><br><br>On this page, Giorno explains to Polnareff that he will not destroy this arrow, so this means that if he did not have this "duty of the survivors", he would destroy the arrow.<br>Now, why was he going to destroy the arrow? think:)</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>OBS: I admit that, there was a mistake in saying that "the arrow of the pucci ended up in Egypt", I really went to check and, at least in the flashback, there is no dialogue saying that it was ended up in Egypt (and that does not mean that it is not the same, and ended up in Egypt, it may be, it may not be).</p></div>this doesn't really prove anything, that arrow was closest to him, and it gave him a requiem stand, so he wouldn't destroy it so he could keep it and give it to whoever he deemed worthy of it</div><p>"so he could keep it and give it to whoever he deemed worthy of it"</p><p>Do you know what common sense is? well, a normal person, after seeing that the arrow is too dangerous and cannot fall into the wrong hands, you would normally destroy, duh.<br>However, Giorno did not destroy the arrow because he wanted to "preserve" a reason why Bruno and Narancia died, Bruno gave his life for Giorno to get that arrow, now imagine you give your life to help your friends achieve something, and in the end your friends destroy that item ..<br>One thing that proves even more what I say, is that Polnareff says to keep the arrow inside the turtle (a place that she can be safe), and if Giorno really wanted to give stands that he thinks worthy, he could also use the black sabbath arrow.<br>I will not waste my time here anymore, I just wanted to understand what makes you conspire against something that the anime makes clear (Giorno seeing that the arrow requires is different, polnareff saying that "this arrow is the only way" being that he knows the existence of the others [meaning that really only that is the solution], diavolo holding all 6 arrows and araki having the job of drawing a beetle in just ONE, 1 HURTING Gold Experience stand arrow, while another one is TRANSPASSING King Crimson ...)<br>The only arrow that we saw to give a requiem stand, is the one that contains a beetle in its design (something that is shown even in games), and I will only change my mind when someone shows me a official scene of someonegetting a requiem stand with an arrow that does not have the beetle.</p>
(Edited by Calebeto)
Wuaeyuoi·9/2/2020
<p>To be honest, I just believe that the beetle designed arrow was designed differently to point out that this arrow wasthe driving force for the plot (and for part 6, perhaps it's just the design of the arrows Araki decided to keep, kinda like DIO's The World in his recent artworklooks just like Diego's THE WORLD; it's a style choice).</p><p>It's like stand users and their fashion. Normally people in the JoJo universe who aren't stand users are bland and they kinda just blend in, but for the stand users, I think Araki stylistically made them more extravagant/different so people couldfigure who is important to the plot before the arc the stand user might appear in.</p><p>For an in-universe explanation, I'd say it was due to the creator of the arrows striving for perfection. It's said he wanted to wield "the power of god"and so he fashioned the arrows from the meteor that fell millennia ago, so there's a solid chance that he made arrows step by step (it's not like he'd make them all at once, that'd be a hassle), each one perhaps getting better than the previous, until he reached his vision of perfection (just like an artist who strives to make each piece better than their previous work).</p><p>Though this is just my viewpoint, but I think it's pretty solid.</p>
(Edited by Wuaeyuoi)
DewdOfStuff·9/3/2020
<div class="quote"><i>Calebeto wrote:<div class="quote">DewdOfStuff wrote:<div class="quote">Calebeto wrote:<div class="quote">Daedalus100 wrote:<div class="quote">EDIT:You know what, you were just playing with that / this, I think I'm going to enter that little group of yours then;</i></div><br>this made me angry</div>Why? I already explained to the guy that both terms "That" and "The" can talk about just 1 object, but he keeps saying that Polnareff is "generalizing" in his lines.<br>I'll tell you, there are situations in which jojofa*g's are more boring than goku / naruto fans, and this is one of them, I wouldn't mind if it was called boring, but at least I don't use an argument as "generalizing", being that the person may also be talking about just 1 object.<br>Man there are countless arguments that I didn’t use here, like for example in thatscene giorno saying:<br>"I will not destroy this arrow";<figure class="article-thumb tleft show-info-icon" style="width: 180px"><a href="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/b/b6/I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png/revision/latest?cb=20200902014721" class="image image-thumbnail"><img src="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/b/b6/I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/180?cb=20200902014721" alt="I will not destroy this arrow" class="thumbimage " data-image-key="I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png" data-image-name="I will not destroy this arrow.png" width="180" height="191"></a> <figcaption><a href="/wiki/File:I_will_not_destroy_this_arrow.png" class="sprite info-icon"></a> </figcaption></figure><p><br><br>On this page, Giorno explains to Polnareff that he will not destroy this arrow, so this means that if he did not have this "duty of the survivors", he would destroy the arrow.<br>Now, why was he going to destroy the arrow? think:)</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>OBS: I admit that, there was a mistake in saying that "the arrow of the pucci ended up in Egypt", I really went to check and, at least in the flashback, there is no dialogue saying that it was ended up in Egypt (and that does not mean that it is not the same, and ended up in Egypt, it may be, it may not be).</p></div>this doesn't really prove anything, that arrow was closest to him, and it gave him a requiem stand, so he wouldn't destroy it so he could keep it and give it to whoever he deemed worthy of it</div>"so he could keep it and give it to whoever he deemed worthy of it"<p>Do you know what common sense is? well, a normal person, after seeing that the arrow is too dangerous and cannot fall into the wrong hands, you would normally destroy, duh.<br>However, Giorno did not destroy the arrow because he wanted to "preserve" a reason why Bruno and Narancia died, Bruno gave his life for Giorno to get that arrow, now imagine you give your life to help your friends achieve something, and in the end your friends destroy that item ..<br>One thing that proves even more what I say, is that Polnareff says to keep the arrow inside the turtle (a place that she can be safe), and if Giorno really wanted to give stands that he thinks worthy, he could also use the black sabbath arrow.<br>I will not waste my time here anymore, I just wanted to understand what makes you conspire against something that the anime makes clear (Giorno seeing that the arrow requires is different, polnareff saying that "this arrow is the only way" being that he knows the existence of the others [meaning that really only that is the solution], diavolo holding all 6 arrows and araki having the job of drawing a beetle in just ONE, 1 HURTING Gold Experience stand arrow, while another one is TRANSPASSING King Crimson ...)<br>The only arrow that we saw to give a requiem stand, is the one that contains a beetle in its design (something that is shown even in games), and I will only change my mind when someone shows me a official scene of someonegetting a requiem stand with an arrow that does not have the beetle.</p></div><p>what do you mean polnareff knew the beetle arrow was the only way, that arrow was closest, and whoever was worthy would get requiem. they didn't have time to fly all the way to another country to get a different arrow</p><p>honestly there's not enough evidence for either side</p>
(Edited by DewdOfStuff)
1
Calebeto·9/8/2020
<div class="quote"><i><p>what do you mean polnareff knew the beetle arrow was the only way, that arrow was closest, and whoever was worthy would get requiem. they didn't have time to fly all the way to another country to get a different arrow</p><p>honestly there's not enough evidence for either side</p></i></div><br><p>If he said "'this beetle arrow' is the only way", then does it mean that if I can use a normal stand arrow (without the beetle), will i get a requiem (which is the weapon to defeat diavolo)? no<br>And no, you know that the colosseum is in Italy, right? and italy is the same place (for example) to get a stand, no one could stop the gang, if they went for example, to Naples, which is where the flesh more or less died and probably has the arrow in that place, it has a distance 228km between the colosseum and naples, which would take 2 hours and 23 minutes, and this is clearly not a long time.<br>Man, I am sending my arguments and you are changing their meaning and speaking as if it were the real, for example, I say: Giorno having to say "I will not destroy this arrow" meaning that he knew that Polnareff thought the arrow would be destroyed, and polnareff thought the arrow would be destroyed for a reason, giorno having the need to make the statement "I will not destroy" so he wants to inform polnareff that he will not do what polnareff is thinking.<br>Now in the case of some here: "But maybe the reason is also that he is going to give stands to the people he finds worthy".<br>Yea, "MAYBE".<br>About something else here, I just came back here to answer the "pucci and polnareff arrows aren't the same":<br>after pucci used the arrow, he went back to Egypt, which was the place whose polnareff found the arrow requiem;</p><figure class="article-thumb tleft show-info-icon" style="width: 180px"><a href="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/f/f2/Pucci_back_to_egypt.png/revision/latest?cb=20200908171229" class="image image-thumbnail"><img src="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/f/f2/Pucci_back_to_egypt.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/180?cb=20200908171229" alt="Pucci back to egypt" class="thumbimage " data-image-key="Pucci_back_to_egypt.png" data-image-name="Pucci back to egypt.png" width="180" height="471"></a> <figcaption><a href="/wiki/File:Pucci_back_to_egypt.png" class="sprite info-icon"></a> </figcaption></figure><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br>Now let me imagine what you are going to say:<br>"this does not prove that pucci did in fact leave the arrow in Egypt".<br>Yes, but do you have any proof that he didn't? no, and as in my argument, people heredid the same with others.</p>
(Edited by Calebeto)
DewdOfStuff·9/8/2020
<p>ok first off nobody said the beetle arrow was the only way, what are you talking about</p><p>secondly, 2 hours and 23 minutes is a long time when you're in the middle of fighting a severely schizophrenic mafia boss who erases time</p><p>third, your whole polnareff thought giorno would destroy the arrow pointproves absolutely nothing</p>
(Edited by DewdOfStuff)
1
Thebannanaworkshop·9/9/2020
<p>i would talk about the dio overheaven novel which mentioned the requiem arrow but sadly thats also nono canon...and bullsh*t so ill put my conclusions in.</p><p>araki obviously doesnt care about the requiem,as he has used it in part 6 and in some art for part 4 and part 3</p><p>the requiem arrows arent like the holy corpses that exist in the sbr verse because there are clear distinctions from a holy corpse to jesus's holy corpse...we dont have that for the requiem arrow.</p><p>actually it does seem like pucci did leave the arrow in egypt,because thats where diavolo got his arrow.</p>
(Edited by Thebannanaworkshop)
1
Sirvane·9/17/2020
<p>no, the arrows are not the same, they are completely different, to start Polnareff would not have kept the arrow that had the beetle specifically in it if they were the same,and he was the only one of the 6 arrows on Stand that had a beetle on it, all the others were completely the same design.</p><figure class="article-thumb tleft show-info-icon" style="width: 180px"><a href="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/c/c5/Arrowheads.png/revision/latest?cb=20160411092419" class="image image-thumbnail"><img src="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/c/c5/Arrowheads.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/180?cb=20160411092419" alt="Arrowheads" class="thumbimage " data-image-key="Arrowheads.png" data-image-name="Arrowheads.png" width="180" height="302"></a> <figcaption><a href="/wiki/File:Arrowheads.png" class="sprite info-icon"></a> <p class="caption">All the arrows shown are visibly identical, except for the one arrow that we've seen give the only requiem stands in the series</p> </figcaption></figure><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>the arrow that was used on Pucci in part 6 is exactly the same as in part 5, Pucci only took it back to Egypt and was later recovered by Polnareff and the Speedwagon foundation</p><figure class="article-thumb tleft show-info-icon" style="width: 180px"><a href="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/9/9b/Beetle_arrowhead_manga.png/revision/latest?cb=20191210024618" class="image image-thumbnail"><img src="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/9/9b/Beetle_arrowhead_manga.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/180?cb=20191210024618" alt="Beetle arrowhead manga" class="thumbimage " data-image-key="Beetle_arrowhead_manga.png" data-image-name="Beetle arrowhead manga.png" width="180" height="154"></a> <figcaption><a href="/wiki/File:Beetle_arrowhead_manga.png" class="sprite info-icon"></a> </figcaption></figure><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>Diavolo didn't even know that Polnareff was alive or that he had the arrow, he just went to the coliseum to kill the gang's traitors who knew about his identity,he was still shocked to see that Polnareff specifically had the arrow with the beetle</p><figure class="article-thumb tleft show-info-icon" style="width: 258px"><a href="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/c/c1/Requiem.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20200917050015" class="image image-thumbnail"><img src="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/c/c1/Requiem.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/258?cb=20200917050015" alt="Requiem" class="thumbimage " data-image-key="Requiem.jpg" data-image-name="Requiem.jpg" width="258" height="397"></a> <figcaption><a href="/wiki/File:Requiem.jpg" class="sprite info-icon"></a> </figcaption></figure><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>if he wereafter a Requiem Stand and the arrows had the same power, it wouldn’t make sense for him to want to use the arrow that was with Polnareff, since he already had a Stand arrow that was used by Polpo,since he is his boss, but he never did, which proves once again that the arrows are different.</p><p><br></p><p><br>Kira does not have a requiem, first it is irrelevant to compare the way the requiem Stands act because it doesn’t change in any way the fact that it was Kira who was pierced, and it was by a normal arrow not by a arrow with a beetleand no, you don’t necessarily have to be worthy to get a requiem, Black Sabbath didn’t turn the Golden Experience into a reuquiem because that was just a common arrow, Polnareff when he was on the farm there was no reason for him to be worthy of the arrow if he wasn't even in danger, the arrow simply pierced the Silver Chariot and he became a requiem</p><figure class="article-thumb tleft show-info-icon" style="width: 180px"><a href="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/5/50/requiem.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20200917052812" class="image image-thumbnail"><img src="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/5/50/requiem.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/180?cb=20200917052812" alt="requiem" class="thumbimage " data-image-key="requiem.jpg" data-image-name="requiem.jpg" width="180" height="277"></a> <figcaption><a href="/wiki/File:Www.requiem.jpg" class="sprite info-icon"></a> </figcaption></figure><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p>King crimsom would rather become a requiem when he was pierced by the Arrow, he was not rejected he would rather become a requiem until he appeared slowly transforming.the transformation was not completed as Bucciarati interrupted before Diavolo could reach<figure class="article-thumb tleft show-info-icon" style="width: 180px"><a href="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/0/0d/X12.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20200917053338" class="image image-thumbnail"><img src="https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/0/0d/X12.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/180?cb=20200917053338" alt="X12" class="thumbimage " data-image-key="X12.jpg" data-image-name="X12.jpg" width="180" height="277"></a> <figcaption><a href="/wiki/File:X12.jpg" class="sprite info-icon"></a> </figcaption></figure> King crimson requiem<p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>so yes the arrows are completely different</p>
(Edited by Sirvane)
DewdOfStuff·9/17/2020
<p>the "requiem arrow" just looks different because araki wanted it to stand (badum tss) out since it's important to the plot, kinda like how the one in part 4 didn't just look like a regular arrow</p>
(Edited by DewdOfStuff)
